Version 3 (modified by 2 months ago) (diff) | ,
---|
PDAFomi_store_obs_l_index_vdist
This page documents the routine PDAFomi_store_obs_l_index_vdist
of PDAF-OMI. This routine has been added with PDAF V2.3.
This routine is used for the case that a user implements a user-provided alternative for the routine PDAFomi_init_dim_obs_l
, which initializes the local observation information for PDAF-OMI in thisobs_l
for a single local analysis domain. This variant is only used for 2+1D factorized localization. For usualy localization the routine PDAFomi_store_obs_l_index is used.
The routine can to be called in init_dim_obs_l_OBSTYPE
in each observation module if a domain-localized filter (LESTKF/LETKF/LNETF/LSEIK/LKNETF) is used.
See the page on user-provided initialization of local observations for the full description of a user-provided routine to intialize local observations. |
The interface is:
SUBROUTINE PDAFomi_store_obs_l_index_vdist(thisobs_l, idx, id_obs_l, distance, & cradius_l, sradius_l, vdist) TYPE(obs_l), INTENT(inout) :: thisobs_l ! Data type with local observation INTEGER, INTENT(in) :: idx ! Element of local observation array to be filled INTEGER, INTENT(in) :: id_obs_l ! Index of local observation in full observation array REAL, INTENT(in) :: distance ! Distance between local analysis domain and observation REAL, INTENT(in) :: cradius_l ! cut-off radius for this local observation ! (directional radius in case of non-isotropic localization) REAL, INTENT(in) :: sradius_l ! support radius for this local observation ! (directional radius in case of non-isotropic localization) REAL, INTENT(in) :: vdist ! support radius in vertical direction for 2+1D factorized
Notes:
idx
is usually the counte over the valid local observation of the observation type in the observation modulecradius_l
andsradius_l
are directional radii, i.e. they are computed depending the direction between local analysis domain and observation, if a non-isotropic horizontal localization is used- While using this routine can be more convenient than doing the initialization of the variables in
thisobs_l
in the user code, in our tests the code ran faster when we did not use this routine, but did this initialization in the user code.